66.18 Concerns arising from the allocation of inadequate workloads or hours of work are addressed first by consultation and discussion with the scientific staff officer. If it is not possible to reach an agreement in this way, the academic staff member may call on a board of directors. The Evaluation Board has no more than three staff and is normally headed by the Dean of the Faculty (or his candidate) and includes two other staff appointed by the Dean, provided that one is placed in place of a head teacher or downstairs. If the appeal is against the dean`s decision, the Evaluation Council is appointed and led by the Prophet or his candidate. The agent may, upon request, be accompanied by a representative. The guidelines on the operation of review boards will apply to the following questions: the standard labelling rate is paid for labelling which does not require a significant exercise. B academic evaluation, for example, if the marker is able to determine the correct answer by applying a marking model, or when general comments or feedback are given on a written work. 14.11.2019 Question 1: With regard to individual references (Annex 1.7), do they refer exclusively to the positions of key experts? If the experts, if they already have written proof of their duties, are not in the format required in Schedule 1.7 (i.e. employer certificates or references for proof of work experience certificate, contracts, reference letters, reports, etc.), would they have the same value as those in Schedule 1.7? If so, it would be possible to use the references cited rather than reproduce them in the Schedule 1.7 format. 36.8 The right to enter into an agreement under this clause is in addition to an agreement between the university and an individual agent, which is included in another term of this agreement, and must not be affected by other means.
29.20.1, with the agreement of the parties, to adopt an informal conference with the parties who have agreed in advance to adopt an arbitrator`s recommendation; or this contract cannot be terminated by any of the parties until [90 days] after the aforementioned date. In the event that the customer wishes to terminate services under this directive, the customer must submit a written request to the company at least seven (7) days before the desired termination date. Written requests for termination can be made by mail or email. If the customer chooses to terminate this contract in writing, all funds owed to the company are immediately due and billed automatically to the customer`s payment method. Under no circumstances will the company reimburse the amount paid for the services provided under this basis. The university advises and consults with a staff member when an overpayment has been found. The university will inform staff of the overpayment and will write to the staff concerned the available refund options. The repayment period is reasonable given the magnitude of the overpayment. The agent and the university negotiate in good faith to reach a repayment agreement that allows the university to deduct overpayment of the agent`s salary or notice, in accordance with the agreed repayment agreement. If such an agreement is not possible, the dispute resolution procedures under clause 12 of this agreement are used to obtain a result that allows the university to recover the overpayment, allowing the university to deduct any overpayment of the agent`s salary or termination allowances.